Are Hindus Cowards?

1. There are nearly 52 Muslim
countries. Show one Muslim
country which provides Haj
subsidy.
2. Show one Muslim country
where Hindus are extended the
special rights that Muslims are
accorded in India?
3. Show one Muslim country
which has a Non-Muslim as its
President or Prime Minister.
4. Show one country where the
82% majority craves for the
indulgence of the 18% minority.
5. Show one Mullah or Maulvi
who has declared a `fatwa' against
terrorists.
6. Hindu-majority Maharashtra,
Bihar, Kerala, Pondicherry, etc.
have in the past elected Muslims
as CMs; Can you ever imagine a
Hindu becoming the CM of
Muslim- majority J&K or
Christian-dominated Nagaland/
Mizoram?
7. Today Hindus are 85%. If
Hindus are intolerant, how come
Masjids and Madrassas are
thriving? How come Muslims are
offering Namaz on the road? How
come Muslims are proclaiming 5
times a day on loudspeakers that
there is no God except Allah?
8. When Hindus gave to Muslims
30% of Bharat for a song, why
should Hindus now beg for their
sacred places at Ayodhya, Mathura
and Kashi?
9. Why temple funds are spent
for the welfare of Muslims and
Christians, when they are free to
spend their money in any way
they like?
10. When uniform is made
compulsory for school children,
why there is no Uniform Civil
Code for citizens?
11. In what way, J&K is different
from Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu or
Uttar Pradesh, to have Article
370?
12. Why Gandhiji supported
Khilafat movement (nothing to do
with our freedom movement) and
what in turn he got?
13. Why Gandhiji objected to the
decision of the cabinet and
insisted that Somnath Temple
should be reconstructed out of
public funds, not government
funds, when in January 1948 he
pressurised Nehru and Patel to
carry on renovation of the
mosques of Delhi at government
expenses?
14. If Muslims & Christians are
minorities in Maharashtra, UP,
Bihar, etc., are Hindus not
minorities in J&K, Mizoram,
Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh,
Meghalaya, etc?. Why are Hindus
denied minority rights in these
States?
15. Do you admit that Hindus do
have problems that need to be
recognized. Or do you think that
those who call themselves Hindus
are themselves the problem?
16. Why post-Godhra is blown
out of proportion, when no- one
talks of the ethnic cleansing of 4
lakh Hindus from Kashmir?
17. In 1947, when India was
partitioned, the Hindu population
in Pakistan was about 24%. Today
it is not even 1%. In 1947, the
Hindu population in East Pakistan
(now Bangladesh) was 30%.
Today it is about 7%. What
happened to the missing Hindus?
Do Hindus have human rights?
18. In contrast, in India, Muslim
population has gone up from
10.4% in 1951 to about 14%
today; whereas Hindu population
has come down from 87.2% in
1951 to 81.5% in 2001. Does
any politician have the guts to ask
Muslims to go for family
planning?
19. Do you consider that -
Sanskrit is communal and Urdu is
secular, Mandir is communal and
Masjid is secular, Sadhu is
communal and Imam is secular,
BJP is communal and Muslim
League is secular, Dr. Praveen
Thogadiya is anti-national and
Bhukari is national, Vande
Matharam is communal and Allah-
O-Akbar is secular, Shriman is
communal and Mian is secular,
Hinduism is communal and Islam
is secular, Hindutva is communal
and Jihadism is secular, and at
last, Bharat is communal and Italy
is secular?
20. When Christian and Muslim
schools can teach Bible and Quran,
why Hindus cannot teach Gita or
Ramayan?
21. Abdul Rehman Antuley was
made a trustee of the famous
Siddhi Vinayak Temple in
Prabhadevi, Mumbai. Can a Hindu
- say Mulayam or Laloo - ever
become a trustee of a Masjid or
Madrassa?
22. Dr. Praveenbhai Thogadiya
has been arrested many times on
flimsy grounds. Has the Shahi
Imam of Jama Masjid, Delhi,
Ahmed Bukhari been arrested for
claiming to be an ISI agent and
advocating partition of Bharat?
23. When Haj pilgrims are given
subsidy, why Hindu pilgrims to
Amarnath, Sabarimalai & Kailash
Mansarover are taxed?
24. In 2003-2004 - A Muslim
President, a Hindu Prime Minister
and a Christian Defence Minister,
running the affairs of the country,
with a unity of purpose. Can this
happen any where except in a
Hindu Nation - Bharat?
25. In Kerala, MLAs, MPs &
Ministers take oath in the name of
Allah and Infant Jesus, which is
against the Constitution. Can a
Hindu take oath in the name of
Ram or Krishna?
26. Arabic language is promoted
in India at Govt. expenses. but not
Sanskrit? Is Arabic more national
than Sanskrit?
27. IMTD act in Assam gives legal
rights to Bangladeshi Muslims to
settle and become Indian citizen,
whereas Indians cannot settle in
Jammu & Kashmir. Why this
double standard?
28. J&K with about 1 crore
population has been provided with
aid worth Rs.24,000 crores, i.e.
Rs.24,000/- per head, whereas in
other states the per head aid is
less than 5% of this amount. Is
this not a reward for anti-
nationalism?
29. If painting is un-Islamic, why
there is no Fatwa issued against
MF Hussain? If he still persists
with painting, is he not doing an
un-Islamic act?
30. If music, singing and dancing
are un-Islamic (because Islam is a
serious religion), why no Fatwa is
issued against the many Khans in
the cinefield. What will they give
up - Islam or Acting?
31. Do you think that India will
remain secular and democratic if
Muslims become majority?
32. When Deepavali &
Janmashtami are celebrated at
White House, House of Commons,
Australian Parliament, etc. why
are they not celebrated in Indian
parliament? Are we more secular
than USA, UK & Australia?
33. If the communal riots is due
to RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal, etc.
why there are riots in Bangladesh,
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq,
Turkey, Afghanistan, Indonesia,
Chechhnya, China, Russia, UK,
France, Spain, Cyprus, etc. -
where there is no RSS/VHP.
34. If Islam is a religion of peace,
why Quran-reading and Gun-
wielding is taught in tandem?
35. How do you explain the
Muslim psyche : Enjoying the
freedom in a democratic country
like India, USA, UK, France, etc.
and still trying to make it an
Islamic nation, where they lose all
freedom.
36. A former President, two
former PMs, Sadhus and Sants
have demonstrated against the
arrest of Kanchi Shankaracharya,
but the media says there is
absolutely no protest. Do you
think violence is the only
yardstick to measure people's
agony?
37. When Quran does not believe
in negotiation (it believes only in
defeating Kafirs in a war), do you
think that the Ayodhya problem
will be solved by negotiation?
38. Do you trust that Islam and
Christianity believe in Sarva
Dharma Samabhav? If yes, why
do they believe in conversion.
39. Don't you believe that Islam
and Christianity are political
ideologies, out to grab nations.
They - through their Mullahs and
Fathers - achieve what Army,
Navy and Air Force cannot, by
converting locals and destroying
their culture.
40. Ishwar Allah tere naam - Can
you show me one Muslim who
has agreed to this?
41. Don't you think that `Secular
Muslim' is a misnomer? A person
can either be Secular or a Muslim,
and not both? A Muslim (who
believes in the only God, Allah)
cannot be secular (believing in
many Gods).
42. UN Charter says that minority
means less than 10% of the
population. How can Muslims,
who are nearly 14% in India be
called a minority?
43. Do you believe that
Communists love our country,
when they refuse to admit that
China was the aggressor in 1962?
44. Do you agree with the thesis
of Communists that India is a
State of different nations, like the
former USSR, (and not a Nation of
different states) and therefore is
bound to break up?
45. How come a Muslim family
peacefully lives in a
predominantly Hindu locality,
whereas a Hindu family is not
able to do so in a Muslim locality?
46. Why Hindu dominated Bharat
is secular for ages and Muslim
dominated countries are only
Islamic with no powers to
minorities?
47. Why Christian Missionaries do
not go to Muslim- dominated
areas and start their social service
there? Is it because they will not
get sufficient return to their
`investment'?
48. Are you aware that India is
the only country which openly
invites infiltrators from
Bangladesh. Bihar, UP and West
Bengal Govts. provide them with
immediate ration cards and make
them voters.
49. Riots take place mostly after
the Friday prayers (e.g. Marad,
Kerala). Is it not because of the
fiery sermons of the Imams?
50. All Hindu-majority regions
are peaceful. But all Hindu-
minority regions have become
problematic - like J&K, North
Eastern parts, etc. Can you explain
why?
51. A MLA, C.P. Shaji, said in
Kerala Assembly that "the hands
that touches even a syllable of the
Shariat will be chopped off then
and there" (Mathrubhumi, July 3,
1985). Do you concur with this?
52. Do you agree that the policies
of all political parties are
contradictory to the aim of uniting
all sections of the people by a
stream of thought?
53. Are you aware that illegal
Muslim immigrants have become
a deciding factor in the election of
nearly 25 Lok Sabha and 120
MLA seats in India? - And they
are voting for a particular party
lump sum - Congress, RJD, SP,
ML or Communists - whichever is
likely to form the Govt.?
54. Are you aware that according
to KPS Gill some of the NGOs or
even media organisations were
actually front offices for terrorist
groups? He says there is a nexus
between some of the terrorist
outfits parading as NGOs and
human rights group.
55. Are you aware that the so-
called secular Maulana
Wahiduddin, when asked to pray
for the Indian soldiers fighting at
Kargil, refused, under the pretext
that he cannot pray for people
who are fighting the Muslims?
(Sonia and Priyanka attended his
funeral later).
56. A Pakistani becomes Indian
when he marries a Muslim girl
from J&K. But when the same
girl marries a Hindu from any part
of India, he does not become a
J&K citizen, but on the contrary,
she loses her J&K citizenship.
What kind of law is this?
57. In the Ayodhya case, the
Supreme Court questioned the
locus standi of Vishwa Hindu
Parishad. But the SC did not
question the locus standi of the
Babri Masjid Action Committee or
the All India Muslim Personal Law
Board. Is this not double standard
on the part of SC?
58. In the Ayodhya dispute, you
say that Hindus must abide by
law. Do you know how many
times the constitution has been
amended to overturn verdicts of
the High Courts and Supreme
Court? - Shah Bano, unseating of
Indira Gandhi, etc.
59. When you are asking for the
resignation of CMs like Narendra
Modi, Uma Bharti, etc. on trivial
grounds, why are you not
demanding the resignation of the
CM of J&K, where thousands of
security personnel have been
killed by terrorists? - where
nearly 4 lakhs Hindus have been
ethnic cleansed.
60. The UP govt. confessed that it
cannot abide by Supreme Court
judgement of 1986 on the
Varanasi burial ground dispute
between Sunni and Shia Muslims.
The Karnataka Govt. refused to
abide by the SC's order on the
Cauvery water dispute. Is this
respecting court judgement?
61. When one Graham Staines is
killed, the English press goes
overboard in condemning his
killers. But when 58 Hindus,
including 30 women and children,
were burnt aline in Sabarmati
Express, they kept silent. The
victims are depicted as the villain.
Is this responsible journalism?
62. Farooq Abdullah, former CM
of J&K who has married a
Christian, rejoiced at the marriage
of his son Umar with a Hindu girl.
But when his daughter married a
Hindu boy, he disowned her. Is he
the icon of secularism?
63. Have you ever visited a
Muslim ghetto? If not please
make it a point to have a Darshan
Yatra of place like Mumbra (near
Mumbai) or Mallapuram in Kerala.
If you are a real secularist, you
will really `feel good'.
64. When Islam and Secularism/
democracy have nothing in
common, why Hindus are made to
watch this ugly dance in their
stupor?
65. According to law, human
organs cannot be an election
symbol of any party. Then how
come `Hand' symbol is allotted to
Congress. Is it not against the
law?
66. Delhi Imam Syed Bhukari
declared that Taliban is the ideal
for all Muslims and Osama Bin
Laden is the hero? Do you
consider him a secular icon?
67. Delhi Imam Syed Bhukari is
rearing a Black Buck in his
courtyard, which is against law.
The Delhi police team which went
there to arrest him, came back
calmly. Is he above law?
68. If Muslims do not want
common civil code, will they
clamour for the Quaranic code of
criminal justice? - eye for eye,
leg for leg, hand for hand, etc.
69. In J&K, about 2 lakh Hindu
adults are voters for the
parliamentary elections, but not
for the assembly. Why?
70. The duration of the J&K
assembly is six years and not 5
years as in other states. Why?
71. Do you support the building
of a Memorial for Afzal Khan,
who plotted to kill Chatrapati
Shivaji, in Pratapgarh
(Maharashtra)?
72. Do you support the building
of a Masjid for Babar, a looter and
invader, at Ayodhya?
73. Do you consider that
celebrating Valentine (Lovers)
Day on 14th Feb. is in tune with
our culture? - when exactly after
9 months, i.e. on 14th Nov. you
celebrate Children's day.
74. What is so special about
Nehru liking children? Children
are liked by one and all. Is it not
absurd to celebrate his birth day
as Children's' Day? The real
Children's' Day should be
Gokulashtami - Yes Lord Krishna.
along with his colleagues did all
the antics of a child.
75. Hindu girls are molested and
gangraped in Bangladesh. Temples
are burnt or destroyed almost
every day. Why none of our
secularists and Human Rights
Activists raise their voice for
Hindus in Bangladesh. Are Human
Rights only for Muslims?
76. Are you aware that Islam
does not believe in nationalism
and national boundaries. It wants
to bring the whole world under
Islam - from Darul Harab to Darul
Islam?
77. A 65 years old Muslim has
remarried his first-divorced wife
for the 54th time. What could
have happened to the other 50+
wives he divorced. What type of
society it would be, can you just
imagine? Do you want this type
of society in India?
78. Why Muslims go after
building Masjids and Madrassas,
and not schools and colleges? Do
you think Madrassas churn out
Scientists and Engineers?
79. Mohurram processions are
being taken out in Hindu majority
areas. But Hindu religious
processions are not allowed
through Muslim localities. Why?
Does this not perpetuate the
communal divide?
80. Is a Dist. Magistrate/Police
Commissioner justified in treating
a particular area in our country as
alien territory (by not allowing
Hindu processions there)? Is he
not violating our constitution? Is
he not abetting communal divide?
81. In six states - J&K, Punjab,
Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya,
Mizoram and Nagaland - where
Hindus are minorities, they do not
have minority rights. But others
who are in majority still enjoy
minority rights there? Is this not
ridiculous?
82. In which Islamic States are
Hindus extended the special rights
that Muslims are accorded in
India? Likewise, in which
Christian State, the Christian
majority accorded Hindus the
special rights that India accords
the Christians?
83. Do you know that Mother
Teresa projected a negative
image of India - of dying without
dignity - to make money. Did she
ever attempt to counter-balance
this image?
84. Do you think that Nehru
family is the only family which
fought for freedom or there were
other freedom fighters too? - like
Bhagat Singh, Chandrasekhar
Azad, Madan Lal Dingra,
Vaanchinathan, Chapekar
Brothers, Veer Savarkar, Raj
Guru, Subhash Chandra Bose,
Udam Singh, etc.
85. There are some pockets in
Godhra where Sales Tax/ Income
Tax/Electricity Personnel cannot
enter. Even policemen do not
tread, unless in huge numbers.
This is not the case where Hindus
are in majority. Can you explain
the reason?
86. In support of Ishrat Jahan, the
lovely terrorist from Mumbra shot
dead by the Ahmedabad police,
the whole locality observed a
Bandh and every one participated
in her funeral. If this is not
supporting terrorism, what it is?
87. China is still showing
Arunachal Pradesh as its territory.
Will you please ask a Communist
to condemn this? He will not. For
Left outfits, Communist
camaraderie comes before the
interest of the nation. Are
Communists nationalists?
88. "The list of those I want to
kill is very long, but I will shoot
Modi if I am given a pistol" said
Vijay Tendulkar. Do you consider
him a Human Rights Activist or a
terrorist?
89. In Mallapuram (Kerala), a
doctor found that 3 generations of
Muslim women - daughter-13,
mother- 26 and grandmother-39
- all pregnant being admitted for
delivery. Do you still think that
family planning is unnecessary for
Muslims?
90. Lalu Prasad Yadav gave a
resounding slap on the face of
judiciary by derisively and openly
notifying his palatial house as Jail.
Do you still feel all are equal
before law?
91. The author of Ramanayan,
Rishi Valmiki, was a bandit. Same
way, the author of Mahabharat,
Veda Vyas, was a fisherman. Both
the epics and the authors are
revered by all Hindus. Do you still
think that Hinduism supports
casteism?
92. In 2002, the Karnataka
Govt.'s revenue from temples was
Rs.72 crores. Out of this, 50
crores were given to Madrassas,
10 crores to Churches and only
10 crores to Temples. Why
Hindus should pay for
development of Madrassas
(terrorist factories) and
Churches?
93. When Taliban demolished the
Buddha statue in Afghanistan,
Times of India wrote that it was
in reaction to the demolition of
Babri mosque. Do you agree to
this justification by TOI? Is tit-
for-tat OK? Then why do you
criticize Gujarat riots in reaction
to Godhra carnage?
94. "Genocide" "Holocaust" are
the words used by the media for
the riots in Gujarat. But do you
know that Jews and Parsis were
never persecuted and lived and
prospered in total freedom in
India?
95. In Pondicherry a Muslim was
denied burial because he
constructed a temple for Lord
Muruga. Do you still think
"Religions do not teach to hate
one another"?
96. Why Mother Teresa did not
stay in her native country,
Albenia, and help poor there?
Why Greham Staines did not stay
in Australia and help needy
people there? Why Sonia Gandhi
selects India, and not Italy, for her
service to the poor? Why do you
want imported leaders - like
imported religion and imported
products? Is India a land for all
and sundry?
97. Are you aware that illegal
immigrants from Bangladesh are
settled in an area where Hindu
candidates win by a narrow
margin, so as to change the trend
in the next election?
98. In 1989 election manifesto of
Congress, Rajiv Gandhi declared
that if the people of Mizoram
voted the Congress to power, it
would run the govt. on the basis
of teachings of Bible. If this is not
communalism, what it is?
99. Shaikh-al-Sayeed Yusuf Sayed
Hashim al Rifai of Kuwait, the
chairman of the World Muslim
Minority Community, was allowed
to land in Kerala without visa. He
was not only not arrested but was
given royal treatment as a guest
of the govt. of Kerala and was
provided with govt. cars to enable
him to carry on conversion. Is this
promoting nationalism?
100. If a Muslim in Britain or USA
(secular countries) cannot marry
more than one woman, why
should he be allowed in India to
marry more?
101. The Pope was invited to
visit India, but the King of Nepal,
Mahendra, was not allowed to
participate in the Makar
Sankaranti function at Nagpur in
1965? Is this secularism?
102. In the Hindu Code Bill, a
Hindu is defined as not being a
Muslim, Christian, or Parsi. It is an
inclusive and unifying definition -
to include all others - Sikhs, Jains,
Buddhists, etc. Then how come
our present- day politicians have
fragmented the Hindu society, can
you ponder?
103. Tipu Sultan wanted to
Islamise the entire south India. He
was prevented from doing so by
the British, as British wanted to
rule them. So he had to fight the
British first. Is he a Indian
freedom fighter? If yes, are
Babar, Aurangazeb, Afzal Khan,
Gazhni, etc. too?
104. An English daily published
Sonia Gandhi's speech on
Hinduism under the column of
spiritualism! Is this not ridiculous,
and insulting Hinduism too? Have
our presspersons become
intellectually bankrupt?
105. Ashoka and Kanishka ruled
Afghanistan. Khandari, mother of
Duryodhana, came from Khandar,
now in Afghanistan. Do you
believe that Afghanistan was once
an integral part of India?
106. Our Sanatan Dharm was
time immemorial. But still
Bharatvarsh was continually
partitioned - Iran, Afghanistan,
Burma, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan,
Bangladesh, etc. Today Kashmir is
with India not because of Sanatan
Dharma but because of our
security forces. Do you agree that
for dismembering Bharat, one has
to target our Sanatan Dharm.
107. The Baptist Church in
Tripura was set up by
missionaries from New Zealand
60 years ago. Do you think the
Church will promote nationalism?
108. Students in Pakistan are
taught from the very beginning
that Hindus are our enemies, that
Hindus can never be our friends
and that Kafirs (Hindus) are to be
killed. Do you still think that
friendship is possible with
Pakistan?
109. The defence establishment
of secular America observes
Church services for Good Friday,
a pure religious ritual, and
deliberately asks evangelists to
address security personnel. Can
you imagine the Indian Army or
Navy or Air Force doing a puja
and inviting a Shankaracharya to
address them?
110. Pakistan is an Islamic
country. But for a by-pass surgery
or cancer operation, they come to
India. How come a country, which
has developed nuclear weapon,
did not develop good hospitals
and world class doctors? Does this
mean that Pakistanis are only
trigger happy, at the cost of
development and health services?
111. Communist leader Stalin's
daughter, Swetlana, wished to
marry Dinesh Singh's brother and
settle in India. Our Communists
and Indira Gandhi opposed this.
How do they now support an
Italian lady?
112. When Yoga has become a
multimillion dollar industry in
USA, why our govt. is blind to this
human- development technology?
Is it because it is a part of Hindu
culture?
113. In a Pooja, the `sankalpa'
begins with "Bharata varshe,
Bharata kande ...". What are
they? Do you still think that
spiritualism and nationalism are
different or are they the two eyes
of the nation?
114. Spiritualism and nationalism
are inseparable in Bharat. Don't
you think that without spiritualism
Bharat will be like a body without
soul?
115. Why should practising my
religion or wearing my religious
symbol hurt the feelings of other
religionists, when their practising
their religion or wearing their
religious symbol does not hurt me
at all? If this is not religious
hatred, what else is?
116. Is it not true that from
1920, the Britishers, knowing that
their rule is going to end soon,
started doling out large plots of
land to Christian organisations and
Churches at throw away prices?
117. Kanchi Shankaracharya is not
allowed to perform pooja and eat
the food he likes, but Pappu
Yadav is allowed all facilities
inside Jail, including Mobile phone
facility for contacting even Bihar
Jail Mantri. Is this equality before
law?
118. Muslims convicts in jail are
allowed time for Namaz and also
given all facilities for observing
Ramzan fasting. Then why Kanchi
Shankaracharya, only an accused,
is denied facilities for performing
Puja in jail?
119. Armstrong, the US astronaut,
landed in moon in 1969. Since
then many astronauts have done
so. Can you inform this to your
Muslim friend and see whether he
admits this fact?
120. Temples are over-crowded
in TN. Durga pooja is celebrated
on a grand scale in West Bengal.
Still in both the states, the God-
fearing people vote for atheists.
Why?
121. In Hinduism, you find a lot
of `Reformers'. Why such
reformers are not found in other
religions? Do they not need
reform?

Oppose the proposed draconian anti-Hindu 'Anti-Superstitions' Bill l Online signature drive

O Hindus, Strongly oppose the proposed draconian anti-Hindu 'Anti-Superstitions' Bill Click here to participate in online signature campaign and voice your protest !               The monsoon session of State Legislative Assembly will start from 25th July 2011. The Government has decided to pass the Anti-Superstitions Bill which is actually an attack on Hindu Dharma. Maharashtra Andha-shraddha Nirmulan Samiti (MANS) has been using pressure tactics on the Government by holding press conferences at various places in favour of the proposed Bill and by warning the Government to undertake 'Jail Bharo' movement. If this Bill is passed, religious acts performed as prescribed in Hindu Dharma and rituals will be considered as a non-bailable offence. It is also likely that 'puja', rituals, 'homa-havan' performed in temples could be treated as offence. Religious organizations and trustees propagating Dharma and Dharmacharan can fall within the purview of this Bill. Therefore, all devout Hindus, temple trustees, religious organizations and parties can undertake following measures to oppose the said Bill. Measures to be undertaken to oppose the Black Magic Bill 1. Meet local MLAs, guardian ministers, ministers, State ministers etc. and elected representatives and put forth before them the facts about the proposed Act and insist that they should become active and see to it that the Act is not passed in the forthcoming session. 2. Submit representations to local district collectors, tehsildars and administrative officers and demand cancellation of the Act. 3. Plan agitation by bringing together organizations that have similar views on the subject at district, taluka, and village level. 4. Participate in online signature drive on HJS' website at this link. http://www.hindujagruti.org/activities/campaigns/religious/anti-faith-bill/#sign 5. Write letters to Chief Minister, Dy. Chief Minister and Minister for Social Justice by self, get such letters written from devout Hindus and organizations protesting against passing of the said Act. Contact details of Ministers 1. Mr. Shivajirao Moghe, Minister for Social Justice, Dept. of Social Justice, Mantralay, Mumbai – 32 Office No. – (022) 22876069, fax – 22876463, E-mail: min_socjust@maharashtra.gov.in 2. Mr. Pruthviraj Chavan, Chief Minister, Maharashtra, Mantralay, Mumbai – 32; Office No.- (022) 22025151, fax – (022) 22029214, E-mail: chiefminister@maharashtra.gov.in 3. Mr. Ajit Pawar, Dy. Chief Minister, Maharashtra, Mantralay, Mumbai – 32. Office No. – (022) 22022401, fax - 22024873 E-mail: DeputyChiefMinister@maharashtra.gov.in To know the proposed Bill visit the following link. http://www.hindujagruti.org/activities/campaigns/religious/anti-faith-bill --

Taj Mahal (or) Tejo Mahalaya

Taj Mahal A Vedic Temple - Hidden Truth Revealed

1. INTRODUCTION

During their rule the muslims looted and destroyed hundreds of thousands of Hindu temples. Aurangzeb himself destroyed 10,000 Hindu temples during his reign! Some of the larger temples were converted

into mosques or other Islamic structures. Ram Janmbhoomi(at Ayodhya) and Krishna Temple(at Mathura) are just two examples. Many others exist!The most evident of such structures is Taj Mahal--a structure supposedly devoted to carnal love by the "great" moghul king Shah Jahan to his favorite wife Mumtaz Mahal. Please keep in my mind tha

t this is the same Shah Jahan who had a harem of 5,000 women and the same Shah Jahan who had a incestuous relationship with his daughter justifing it by saying, 'a gardener has every right to taste the fruit he has planted'! Is such a person even capable of imagining such a wondrous

structure as the Taj Mahal let alone be the architect of it?

The answer is no. It cannot be. And it isn't as has been proven. The Taj Mahal is as much a Islamic structure as is mathematics a muslim discovery! The famous historian Shri P.N. Oak has proven that Taj Mahal is actually Tejo Mahalaya- a shiv temple-palace. His work was published in 1965 in the book, Taj Mahal - The True Story. However, we have not heard much about it because it was banned by the corrupt and power crazed Congress government of Bharat who did not want to alienate their precious vote bank--the muslims.

--------------------------------------------------------
2. THE TEJO MAHALAYA
After reading Shri Oak's work which provides more than adequate evidence to prove that Taj Mahal is indeed Tejo Mahalaya, one has to wonder if the government of Bharat has been full of traitors for the past 50 years! Because to ban such a book which states only the truth is surely a crime against our great nation of Bharat.
The most valuable evidence of all that Tejo Mahalaya is not an Islamic building is in the Badshahnama which contains the history of the first twenty years of Shah Jahan's reign. The writer Abdul Hamid has stated that Taj Mahal is a temple-palace taken from Jaipur's Maharaja Jaisingh and the building was known as Raja Mansingh's palace. This by itself is enough proof to state that Tejo Mahalaya is a Hindu structure captured, plundered and converted to a mausoleum by Shah Jahan and his henchmen. But I have taken the liberty to provide you with 109 other proofs and logical points which tell us that the structure known as the Taj Mahal is actually Tejo Mahalaya .
There is a similar story behind Every Islamic structure in Bharat. They are all converted Hindu structures. As I mentioned above, hundereds of thousands of temples in Bharat have been destroyed by the barbaric muslim invaders and I shall dedicate several articles to these destroyed temples. However, the scope of this article is to prove to you beyond the shadow of any doubt that Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya and should be recognized as such! Not as a monument to the dead Mumtaz Mahal--an insignificant . object in the incestous Shah Jahan's harem of 5,000.

Another very important proof that Taj Mahal is a Hindu structure is shown by figure 1 below. It depicts Aurangzeb's letter to Shah Jahan in Persian in which he has unintentionally revealed the true identity of the Taj Mahal as a Hindu Temple-Palace. Refer to proofs 20 and 66 stated below.

Take the time to read the proofs stated below and know to what extent we have been lied to by our own leaders. These proofs of Shri P.N. Oak have been taken from the URL:
http://rbhatnagar.ececs.uc.edu:8080/hindu_history/modern/taj_oak.html I would like to commend the creator of the above mentioned web site for taking the time to put up the proofs given by Shri P.N. Oak.

For more information you can order the book, Taj Mahal - The True Story authored by Shri P.N. Oak. The ISBN number of the book is ISBN 0-9611614-4-2. The book is available through A. Ghosh (Publisher), 5720 W. Little York, #216, Houston, Texas 77091. Visit Sword Of Truth - Online Magazine for more information"
Proofs follow below:
--------------------------------------------------------

3. NAME
The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
The ending "Mahal" is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
The tomb should be understood to signify Not A Building but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, 'Taj' and' Mahal' are of Sanskrit origin.

--------------------------------------------------------

4. TEMPLE TRADITION
The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz's centotaphs are fake.
The pitchers carved inside the upper border of the marble lattice plus those mounted on it number 108-a number sacred in Hindu Temple tradition.
There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.
In India there are 12 Jyotirlingas i.e., the outstanding Shiva Temples. The Tejomahalaya alias The Tajmahal appears to be one of them known as Nagnatheshwar since its parapet is girdled with Naga, i.e., Cobra figures. Ever since Shahjahan's capture of it the sacred temple has lost its Hindudom.
The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the Tej-Linga amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient centre of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night especially during the month of Shravan. During the last few centuries the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples viz., Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras, consecrated in the Tejomahalay alias Tajmahal.
The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name of Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28,1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej. --------------------------------------------------------

5. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
Shahjahan's own court chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (page 403, vol 1) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a dome (Imaarat-a-Alishan wa Gumbaze) was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisigh for Mumtaz's burial, and the building was known as Raja Mansingh's palace.
The plaque put the archealogy department outside the Tajmahal describes the edifice as a mausoleum built by Shahjahan for his wife Mumtaz Mahal, over 22 years from 1631 to 1653 That plaque is a specimen of historical bungling. Firstly, the plaque sites no authority for its claim. Secondly the lady's name was Mumtaz-ulZamani and not Mumtazmahal. Thirdly, the period of 22 years is taken from some mumbo jumbo noting by an unreliable French visitor Tavernier, to the exclusion of all muslim versions, which is an absurdity.
Prince Aurangzeb's letter (Refer to Figure 1 above) to his father, emperor Shahjahan, is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled Aadaab-e-Alamgiri, Yadgarnama, and the Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadi (edited by Said Ahmed, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2). In that letter Aurangzeb records in 1652 A.D itself that the several buildings in the fancied burial place of Mumtaz were seven storeyed and were so old that they were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on the northern side. Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later. This is the proof that during Shahjahan's reign itself that the Taj complex was so old as to need immediate repairs.
The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal KapadDwara collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 (bearing modern nos. R.176 and 177) requestioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public.
The Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner preserve three other firmans addressed by Shahjahan to the Jaipur's ruler Jaisingh ordering the latter to supply marble (for Mumtaz's grave and koranic grafts) from his Makranna quarris, and stone cutters. Jaisingh was apparently so enraged at the blatant seizure of the Tajmahal that he refused to oblige Shahjahan by providing marble for grafting koranic engravings and fake centotaphs for further desecration of the Tajmahal. Jaisingh looked at Shahjahan's demand for marble and stone cutters, as an insult added to injury. Therefore, he refused to send any marble and instead detained the stone cutters in his protective custody.
The three firmans demanding marble were sent to Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz's death. Had Shahjahan really built the Tajmahal over a period of 22 years, the marble would have needed only after 15 or 20 years not immediately after Mumtaz's death.
Moreover, the three mention neither the Tajmahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some supercial tinkering and tampering with the Tajmahal. Even otherwise Shahjahan could never hope to build a fabulous Tajmahal by abject dependence for marble on a non cooperative Jaisingh. --------------------------------------------------------


6. EUROPEAN VISITORS ACCOUNT.
Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan (i.e.,`The Taj building') where foriegners used to come as they do even today so that the world may admire. He also adds that the cost of the scaffolding was more than that of the entire work. The work that Shahjahan commissioned in the Tejomahalaya Shiva temple was plundering at the costly fixtures inside it, uprooting the Shiva idols, planting the centotaphs in their place on two stories, inscribing the koran along the arches and walling up six of the seven stories of the Taj. It was this plunder, desecrating and plunderring of the rooms which took 22 years. Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtaz's death) that `the places of note in and around Agra, included Taj-e-Mahal's tomb, gardens and bazaars'. He, therefore, confirms that that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan. De Laet, a Dutch official has listed Mansingh's palace about a mile from Agra fort, as an outstanding building of pre shahjahan's time. Shahjahan's court chronicle, the Badshahnama records, Mumtaz's burial in the same Mansingh's palace. Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslim's were barred entry into the basement (at the time when Shahjahan requisitioned Mansingh's palace) which contained a dazzling light. Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shiva's idol. Shahjahan comandeered the building to grab all the wealth, making Mumtaz's death a convineant pretext. Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 (only 7 years after mumtaz's death) in detail (in his Voyages and Travels to West-Indies, published by John Starkey and John Basset, London), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653.
--------------------------------------------------------


7. SANSKRIT INSCRIPTION
A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor of the Lucknow museum), it refers to the raising of a "crystal white Shiva temple so alluring that Lord Shiva once enshrined in it decided never to return to Mount Kailash his usual abode". That inscription dated 1155 A.D. was removed from the Tajmahal garden at Shahjahan's orders. Historicians and Archeaologists have blundered in terming the insription the Bateshwar inscription when the record doesn't say that it was found by Bateshwar. It ought, in fact, to be called The Tejomahalaya inscription because it was originally installed in the Taj garden before it was uprooted and cast away at Shahjahan's command.
A clue to the tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217, vol. 4, of Archealogiical Survey of India Reports (published 1874) stating that a "great square black balistic pillar which, with the base and capital of another pillar....now in the grounds of Agra, ...it is well known, once stood in the garden of Tajmahal".
--------------------------------------------------------


8. MISSING ELEPHANT

Far from the building of the Taj, Shahjahan disfigured it with black koranic lettering and heavily robbed it of its Sanskrit inscription, several idols and two huge stone elephants extending their trunks in a welcome arch over the gateway where visitors these days buy entry tickets. An Englishman, Thomas Twinning, records (pg.191 of his book "Travels in India A Hundred Years ago") that in November 1794 "I arrived at the high walls which enclose the Taj-e-Mahal and its circumjacent buildings. I here got out of the palanquine and.....mounted a short flight of steps leading to a beautiful portal which formed the centre of this side of the Court Of Elephants as the great area was called."
--------------------------------------------------------


9. KORANIC PATCHES
The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or the remotest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan's authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he would have said so in so many words before beginning to quote Koran.
That Shahjahan, far from building the marble Taj, only disfigured it with black lettering is mentioned by the inscriber Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building. A close scrutiny of the Koranic lettering reveals that they are grafts patched up with bits of variegated stone on an ancient Shiva temple.
--------------------------------------------------------

10.CARBON 14 TEST
A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory and initiated by Professors at Pratt School of Architecture, New York, has revealed that the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan,since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, had to b replaced from time to time. The Taj edifice is much more older. It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e., almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.
--------------------------------------------------------

11. ARCHITECTURAL EVIDENCE


Well known Western authorities on architechture like E.B.Havell, Mrs.Kenoyer and Sir W.W.Hunterhave gone on record to say that the TajMahal is built in the Hindu temple style. Havell points out the ground plan of the ancient Hindu Chandi Seva Temple in Java is identical with that of the Taj. A central dome with cupolas at its four corners is a universal feature of Hindu temples. The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They are used as lamp towers during night and watch towers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship have pillars raised at the four corners. The octagonal shape of the Tajmahal has a special Hindu significance because Hindus alone have special names for the eight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. The pinnacle points to the heaven while the foundation signifies to the nether world. Hindu forts, cities, palaces and temples genrally have an octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover all the ten directions in which the king or God holds sway, according to Hindu belief. The Tajmahal has a trident pinncle over the dome. A full scale of the trident pinnacle is inlaid in the red stone courtyard to the east of the Taj. The central shaft of the trident depicts a Kalash (sacred pot) holding two bent mango leaves and a coconut. This is a sacred Hindu motif. Identical pinnacles have been seen over Hindu and Buddhist temples in the Himalayan region. Tridents are also depicted against a red lotus background at the apex of the stately marble arched entrances on all four sides of the Taj. People fondly but mistakenly believed all these centuries that the Taj pinnacle depicts a Islamic cresent and star was a lighting conductor installed by the British rulers in India. Contrarily, the pinnacle is a marvel of Hindu metallurgy since the pinnacle made of non rusting alloy, is also perhaps a lightning deflector. That the pinnacle of the replica is drawn in the eastern courtyard is significant because the east is of special importance to the Hindus, as the direction in which the sun rises. The pinnacle on the dome has the word `Allah' on it after capture. The pinnacle figure on the ground does not have the word Allah. --------------------------------------------------------


12. INCONSISTENCIES


The two buildings which face the marble Taj from the east and west are identical in design, size and shape and yet the eastern building is explained away by Islamic tradition, as a community hall while the western building is claimed to be a mosque. How could buildings meant for radically different purposes be identical? This proves that the western building was put to use as a mosque after seizure of the Taj property by Shahjahan. Curiously enough the building being explained away as a mosque has no minaret. They form a pair af reception pavilions of the Tejomahalaya temple palace. A few yards away from the same flank is the Nakkar Khana alias DrumHouse which is a intolerable incongruity for Islam. The proximity of the Drum House indicates that the western annex was not originally a mosque. Contrarily a drum house is a neccesity in a Hindu temple or palace because Hindu chores,in the morning and evening, begin to the sweet strains of music. The embossed patterns on the marble exterior of the centotaph chamber wall are foilage of the conch shell design and the Hindu letter OM. The octagonally laid marble lattices inside the centotaph chamber depict pink lotuses on their top railing. The Lotus, the conch and the OM are the sacred motifs associated with the Hindu deities and temples. The spot occupied by Mumtaz's centotaph was formerly occupied by the Hindu Teja Linga a lithic representation of Lord Shiva. Around it are five perambulatory passages. Perambulation could be done around the marble lattice or through the spacious marble chambers surrounding the centotaph chamber, and in the open over the marble platform. It is also customary for the Hindus to have apertures along the perambulatory passage, overlooking the deity. Such apertures exist in the perambulatories in the Tajmahal. The sanctom sanctorum in the Taj has silver doors and gold railings as Hindu temples have. It also had nets of pearl and gems stuffed in the marble lattices. It was the lure of this wealth which made Shahjahan commandeer the Taj from a helpless vassal Jaisingh, the then ruler of Jaipur. Peter Mundy, a Englishman records (in 1632, within a year of Mumtaz's death) having seen a gem studded gold railing around her tomb. Had the Taj been under construction for 22 years, a costly gold railing would not have been noticed by Peter mundy within a year of Mumtaz's death. Such costl fixtures are installed in a building only after it is ready for use. This indicates that Mumtaz's centotaph was grafted in place of the Shivalinga in the centre of the gold railings. Subsequently the gold railings, silver doors, nets of pearls, gem fillings etc. were all carried away to Shahjahan's treasury. The seizure of the Taj thus constituted an act of highhanded Moghul robery causing a big row between Shahjahan and Jaisingh. In the marble flooring around Mumtaz's centotaph may be seen tiny mosaic patches. Those patches indicate the spots where the support for the gold railings were embedded in the floor. They indicate a rectangular fencing. Above Mumtaz's centotaph hangs a chain by which now hangs a lamp. Before capture by Shahjahan the chain used to hold a water pitcher from which water used to drip on the Shivalinga. It is this earlier Hindu tradition in the Tajmahal which gave the Islamic myth of Shahjahan's love tear dropping on Mumtaz's tomb on the full moon day of the winter eve.
--------------------------------------------------------


13. TREASURY WELL


Between the so-called mosque and the drum house is a multistoried octagonal well with a flight of stairs reaching down to the water level. This is a traditional treasury well in Hindu temple palaces. Treasure chests used to be kept in the lower apartments while treasury personnel had their offices in the upper chambers. The circular stairs made it difficult for intruders to reach down to the treasury or to escape with it undetected or unpursued. In case the premises had to be surrendered to a besieging enemy the treasure could be pushed into the well to remain hidden from the conquerer and remain safe for salvaging if the place was reconquered. Such an elaborate multistoried well is superflous for a mere mausoleum. Such a grand, gigantic well is unneccesary for a tomb.
--------------------------------------------------------


14. BURIAL DATE UNKNOWN


Had Shahjahan really built the Taj Mahal as a wonder mausoleum, history would have recorded a specific date on which she was ceremoniously buried in the Taj Mahal. No such date is ever mentioned. This important missing detail decisively exposes the falsity of the Tajmahal legend. Even the year of Mumtaz's death is unknown. It is variously speculated to be 1629, 1630, 1631 or 1632. Had she deserved a fabulous burial, as is claimed, the date of her death had not been a matter of much speculation. In an harem teeming with 5000 women it was difficult to keep track of dates of death. Apparently the date of Mumtaz's death was so insignificant an event, as not to merit any special notice. Who would then build a Taj for her burial?
--------------------------------------------------------

15. BASELESS LOVE STORIES


Stories of Shahjahan's exclusive infatuation for Mumtaz's are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has any book ever written on their fancied love affairs. Those stories have been invented as an afterthought to make Shahjahan's authorship of the Taj look plausible.
--------------------------------------------------------


16. COST


The cost of the Taj is nowhere recorded in Shahjahan's court papers because Shahjahan never built the Tajmahal. That is why wild estimates of the cost by gullible writers have ranged from 4 million to 91.7 million rupees.
--------------------------------------------------------


17. PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION


Likewise the period of construction has been guessed to be anywhere between 10 years and 22 years. There would have not been any scope for guesswork had the building construction been on record in the court papers.
--------------------------------------------------------


18 ARCHITECTS


The designer of the Tajmahal is also variously mentioned as Essa Effendy, a Persian or Turk, or Ahmed Mehendis or a Frenchman, Austin deBordeaux, or Geronimo Veroneo, an Italian, or Shahjahan himself.
--------------------------------------------------------


19. RECORDS DON'T EXIST.


Twenty thousand labourers are supposed to have worked for 22 years during Shahjahan's reign in building the Tajmahal. Had this been true, there should have been available in Shahjahan's court papers design drawings, heaps of labour muster rolls, daily expenditure sheets, bills and receipts of material ordered, and commisioning orders. There is not even a scrap of paper of this kind. It is, therefore, court flatterers, blundering historians, somnolent archeologists, fiction writers, senile poets, careless tourists officials and erring guides who are responsible for hustling the world into believing in Shahjahan's mythical authorship of the Taj. Description of the gardens around the Taj of Shahjahan's time mention Ketaki, Jai, Jui, Champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these are plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel leaves are exclusively used in Lord Shiva's worship. A graveyard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of using fruit and flower from plants in a cemetary is abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan. Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea beaches. The Taj is one such built on the bank of the Yamuna river an ideal location for a Shiva temple. Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of a muslim should be inconspicous and must not be marked by even a single tombstone. In flagrant violation of this, the Tajamhal has one grave in the basement and another in the first floor chamber both ascribed to Mumtaz. Those two centotaphs were infact erected by Shahjahan to bury the two tier Shivalingas that were consecrated in the Taj. It is customary for Hindus to install two Shivalingas one over the other in two stories as may be seen in the Mahankaleshwar temple in Ujjain and the Somnath temple raised by Ahilyabai in Somnath Pattan. The Tajmahal has identical entrance arches on all four sides. This is a typical Hindu building style known as Chaturmukhi, i.e.,four faced.
--------------------------------------------------------


20. THE HINDU DOME


The Tajmahal has a reverberating dome. Such a dome is an absurdity for a tomb which must ensure peace and silence. Contrarily reverberating domes are a neccesity in Hindu temples because they create an ecstatic dinmultiplying and magnifying the sound of bells, drums and pipes accompanying the worship of Hindu deities. The Tajmahal dome bears a lotus cap. Original Islamic domes have a bald top as is exemplified by the Pakistan Embassy in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, and the domes in the Pakistan's newly built capital Islamabad. The Tajmahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.
--------------------------------------------------------


21. TOMB IS THE GRAVE, NOT THE BUILDING


A widespread misunderstanding has resulted in mistaking the building for the grave.Invading Islam raised graves in captured buildings in every country it overran. Therefore, hereafter people must learn not to confound the building with the grave mounds which are grafts in conquered buildings. This is true of the Tajmahal too. One may therefore admit (for arguments sake) that Mumtaz lies buried inside the Taj. But that should not be construed to mean that the Taj was raised over Mumtaz's grave. The Taj is a seven storied building. Prince Aurangzeb also mentions this in his letter to Shahjahan (Refer to the Figure 1 above). The marble edifice comprises four stories including the lone, tall circular hall inside the top, and the lone chamber in the basement. In between are two floors each containing 12 to 15 palatial rooms. Below the marble plinth reaching down to the river at the rear are two more stories in red stone. They may be seen from the river bank. The seventh storey must be below the ground (river) level since every ancient Hindu building had a subterranian storey. Immediately bellow the marble plinth on the river flank are 22 rooms in red stone with their ventilators all walled up by Shahjahan. Those rooms, made uninhibitably by Shahjahan, are kept locked by Archealogy Department of India. The lay visitor is kept in the dark about them. Those 22 rooms still bear ancient Hindu paint on their walls and ceilings. On their side is a nearly 33 feet long corridor. There are two door frames one at either end ofthe corridor. But those doors are intriguingly sealed with brick and lime. Apparently those doorways originally sealed by Shahjahan have been since unsealed and again walled up several times. In 1934 a resident of Delhi took a peep inside from an opening in the upper part of the doorway. To his dismay he saw huge hall inside. It contained many statues huddled around a central beheaded image of Lord Shiva. It could be that, in there, are Sanskrit inscriptions too. All the seven stories of the Tajmahal need to be unsealed and scoured to ascertain what evidence they may be hiding in the form of Hindu images, Sanskrit inscriptions, scriptures, coins and utensils. Apart from Hindu images hidden in the sealed stories it is also learnt that Hindu images are also stored in the massive walls of the Taj. Between 1959 and 1962 when Mr. S.R. Rao was the Archealogical Superintendent in Agra, he happened to notice a deep and wide crack in the wall of the central octagonal chamber of the Taj. When a part of the wall was dismantled to study the crack out popped two or three marble images. The matter was hushed up and the images were reburied where they had been embedded at Shahjahan's behest. Confirmation of this has been obtained from several sources. It was only when I began my investigation into the antecedents of the Taj I came across the above information which had remained a forgotten secret. What better proof is needed of the Temple origin of the Tajmahal? Its walls and sealed chambers still hide in Hindu idols that were consecrated in it before Shahjahan's seizure of the Taj.
--------------------------------------------------------

22. PRE-SHAHJAHAN REFERENCES TO THE TAJ


Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have an chequered history. The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards but passing into Hindu hands off and on, the sanctity of the Taj as a Shiva temple continued to be revived after every muslim onslaught. Shahjahan was the last muslim to desecrate the Tajmahal alias Tejomahalay. Vincent Smith records in his book titled `Akbar the Great Moghul' that `Babur's turbulent life came to an end in his garden palace in Agra in 1630'. That palace was none other than the Tajmahal. Babur's daughter Gulbadan Begum in her chronicle titled Humayun Nama refers to the Taj as the Mystic House. Babur himself refers to the Taj in his memoirs as the palace captured by Ibrahim Lodi containing a central octagonal chamber and having pillars on the four sides. All these historical references allude to the Taj 100 years before Shahjahan. The Tajmahal precincts extend to several hundred yards in all directions. Across the river are ruins of the annexes of the Taj, the bathing ghats and a jetty for the ferry boat. In the Victoria gardens outside covered with creepers is the long spur of the ancient outer wall ending in a octagonal red stone tower. Such extensive grounds all magnificently done up, are a superfluity for a grave. Had the Taj been specially built to bury Mumtaz, it should not have been cluttered with other graves. But the Taj premises contain several graves atleast in its eastern and southern pavilions. In the southern flank, on the other side of the Tajganj gate are buried in identical pavilions queens Sarhandi Begum, and Fatehpuri Begum and a maid Satunnisa Khanum. Such parity burial can be justified only if the queens had been demoted or the maid promoted. But since Shahjahan had commandeered (not built) the Taj, he reduced it general to a muslim cemetary as was the habit of all his Islamic predeccssors, and buried a queen in a vacant pavillion and a maid in another idenitcal pavilion. Shahjahan was married to several other women before and after Mumtaz. She, therefore, deserved no special consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for her. Mumtaz was a commoner by birth and so she did not qualify for a fairyland burial. Mumtaz died in Burhanpur which is about 600 miles from Agra. Her grave there is intact. Therefore, the centotaphs raised in stories of the Taj in her name seem to be fakes hiding in Hindu Shiva emblems. Shahjahan seems to have simulated Mumtaz's burial in Agra to find a pretext to surround the temple palace with his fierce and fanatic troops and remove all the costly fixtures in his treasury. This finds confirmation in the vague noting in the Badshahnama which says that the Mumtaz's (exhumed) body was brought to Agra from Burhanpur and buried `next year'. An official term would not use a nebulous term unless it is to hide some thing. A pertinent consideration is that a Shahjahan who did not build any palaces for Mumtaz while she was alive, would not build a fabulous mausoleum for a corpse which was no longer kicking or clicking. Another factor is that Mumtaz died within two or three years of Shahjahan becoming an emperor. Could he amass so much superflous wealth in that short span as to squander it on a wonder mausoleum? While Shahjahan's special attachment to Mumtaz is nowhere recorded in history his amorous affairs with many other ladies from maids to mannequins including his own daughter Jahanara, find special attention in accounts of Shahjahan's reign. Would Shahjahan shower his hard earned wealth on Mumtaz's corpse? Shahjahan was a stingy, usurious monarch. He came to throne murdering all his rivals. He was not therefore, the doting spendthrift that he is made out to be. A Shahjahan disconsolate on Mumtaz's death is suddenly credited with a resolve to build the Taj. This is a psychological incongruity. Grief is a disabling, incapacitating emotion. A infatuated Shahjahan is supposed to have raised the Taj over the dead Mumtaz, but carnal, physical sexual love is again a incapacitating emotion. A womaniser is ipso facto incapable of any constructive activity. When carnal love becomes uncontrollable the person either murders somebody or commits suicide. He cannot raise a Tajmahal. A building like the Taj invariably originates in an ennobling emotion like devotion to God, to one's mother and mother country or power and glory. Early in the year 1973, chance digging in the garden in front of the Taj revealed another set of fountains about six feet below the present fountains. This proved two things. Firstly, the subterranean fountains were there before Shahjahan laid the surface fountains. And secondly that those fountains are aligned to the Taj that edifice too is of pre Shahjahan origin. Apparently the garden and its fountains had sunk from annual monsoon flooding and lack of maintenance for centuries during the Islamic rule. The stately rooms on the upper floor of the Tajmahal have been striped of their marble mosaic by Shahjahan to obtain matching marble for raising fake tomb stones inside the Taj premises at several places. Contrasting with the rich finished marble ground floor rooms the striping of the marble mosaic covering the lower half of the walls and flooring of the upper storey have given those rooms a ., robbed look. Since no visitors are allowed entry to the upper storey this despoilation by Shahjahan has remained a well guarded secret. There is no reason why Shahjahan's loot of the upper floor marble should continue to be hidden from the public even after 200 years of termination of Moghul rule. Bernier, the French traveller has recorded that no non muslim was allowed entry into the secret nether chambers of the Taj because there are some dazzling fixtures there. Had those been installed by Shahjahan they should have been shown the public as a matter of pride. But since it was commandeered Hindu wealth which Shahjahan wanted to remove to his treasury, he didn't want the public to know about it. The approach to Taj is dotted with hillocks raised with earth dugout from foundation trenches. The hillocks served as outer defences of the Taj building complex. Raising such hillocks from foundation earth, is a common Hindu device of hoary origin. Nearby Bharatpur provides a graphic parallel. Peter Mundy has recorded that Shahjahan employed thousands of labourers to level some of those hillocks. This is a graphic proof of the Tajmahal existing before Shahjahan. At the backside of the river bank is a Hindu crematorium, several palaces, Shiva temples and bathings of ancient origin. Had Shahjahan built the Tajmahal, he would have destroyed the Hindu features. The story that Shahjahan wanted to build a Black marble Taj across the river, is another motivated myth. The ruins dotting the other side of the river are those of Hindu structures demolished during muslim invasions and not the plinth of another Tajmahal. Shahjahan who did not even build the white Tajmahal would hardly ever think of building a black marble Taj. He was so miserly that he forced labourers to work gratis even in the superficial tampering neccesary to make a Hindu temple serve as a Muslim tomb. The marble that Shahjahan used for grafting Koranic lettering in the Taj is of a pale white shade while the rest of the Taj is built of a marble with rich yellow tint. This disparity is proof of the Koranic extracts being a superimposition. Though imaginative attempts have been made by some historians to foist some fictitious name on history as the designer of the Taj others more imaginative have credited Shajahan himself with superb architechtural proficiency and artistic talent which could easily concieve and plan the Taj even in acute bereavment. Such people betray gross ignorance of history in as much as Shajahan was a cruel tyrant ,a great womaniser and a drug and drink addict. Fanciful accounts about Shahjahan commisioning the Taj are all confused. Some asserted that Shahjahan ordered building drawing from all over the world and chose one from among them. Others assert that a man at hand was ordered to design a mausoleum amd his design was approved. Had any of those versions been true Shahjahan's court papers should have had thousands of drawings concerning the Taj. But there is not even a single drawing. This is yet another clinching proof that Shahjahan did not commision the Taj. The Tajmahal is surrounded by huge mansions which indicate that several battles have been waged around the Taj several times. At the south east corner of the Taj is an ancient royal cattle house. Cows attached to the Tejomahalay temple used to reared there. A cowshed is an incongruity in an Islamic tomb. Over the western flank of the Taj are several stately red stone annexes. These are superflous for a mausoleum. The entire Taj complex comprises of 400 to 500 rooms. Residential accomodation on such a stupendous scale is unthinkable in a mausoleum. The neighbouring Tajganj township's massive protective wall also encloses the Tajmahal temple palace complex. This is a clear indication that the Tejomahalay temple palace was part and parcel of the township. A street of that township leads straight into the Tajmahal. The Tajganj gate is aligned in a perfect straight line to the octagonal red stone garden gate and the stately entrance arch of the Tajmahal. The Tajganj gate besides being central to the Taj temple complex, is also put on a pedestal. The western gate by which the visitors enter the Taj complex is a camparatively minor gateway. It has become the entry gate for most visitors today because the railway station and the bus station are on that side. The Tajmahal has pleasure pavillions which a tomb would never have. A tiny mirror glass in a gallery of the Red Fort in Agra reflects the Taj mahal. Shahjahan is said to have spent his last eight years of life as a prisoner in that gallery peering at the reflected Tajmahal and sighing in the name of Mumtaz. This myth is a blend of many falsehoods. Firstly, old Shajahan was held prisoner by his son Aurangzeb in the basement storey in the Fort and not in an open, fashionable upper storey. Secondly, the glass piece was fixed in the 1930's by Insha Allah Khan, a peon of the archaelogy dept.just to illustrate to the visitors how in ancient times the entire apartment used to scintillate with tiny mirror pieces reflecting the Tejomahalay temple a thousand fold. Thirdly, a old decrepit Shahjahan with pain in his joints and cataract in his eyes, would not spend his day craning his neck at an awkward angle to peer into a tiny glass piece with bedimmed eyesight when he could as well his face around and have full, direct view of the Tjamahal itself. But the general public is so gullible as to gulp all such prattle of wily, unscrupulous guides. That the Tajmahal dome has hundreds of iron rings sticking out of its exterior is a feature rarely noticed. These are made to hold Hindu earthen oil lamps for temple illumination. Those putting implicit faith in Shahjahan authorship of the Taj have been imagining Shahjahan-Mumtaz to be a soft hearted romantic pair like Romeo and Juliet. But contemporary accounts speak of Shahjahan as a hard hearted ruler who was constantly egged on to acts of tyranny and cruelty, by Mumtaz. School and College history carry the myth that Shahjahan reign was a golden period in which there was peace and plenty and that Shahjahan commisioned many buildings and patronized literature. This is pure fabrication. Shahjahan did not commision even a single building as we have illustrated by a detailed analysis of the Tajmahal legend. Shahjahn had to enrage in 48 military campaigns during a reign of nearly 30 years which proves that his was not a era of peace and plenty. The interior of the dome rising over Mumtaz's centotaph has a representation of Sun and cobras drawn in gold. Hindu warriors trace their origin to the Sun. For an Islamic mausoleum the Sun is redundant. Cobras are always associated with Lord Shiva.
--------------------------------------------------------


23. FORGED DOCUMENTS.


The muslim caretakers of the tomb in the Tajmahal used to possess a document which they styled as Tarikh-i-Tajmahal. Historian H.G. Keene has branded it as a document of doubtful authenticity. Keene was uncannily right since we have seen that Shahjahan not being the creator of the Tajmahal any document which credits Shahjahn with the Tajmahal, must be an outright forgery. Even that forged document is reported to have been smuggled out of Pakistan. Besides such forged documents there are whole chronicles on the Taj which are pure concoctions. There is lot of sophistry and casuistry or atleast confused thinking associated with the Taj even in the minds of proffesional historians, archaelogists and architects. At the outset they assert that the Taj is entirely Muslim in design. But when it is pointed out that its lotus capped dome and the four corner pillars etc. are all entirely Hindu those worthies shift ground and argue that that was probably because the workmen were Hindu and were to introduce their own patterns. Both these arguments are wrong because Muslim accounts claim the designers to be Muslim, and the workers invariably carry out the employer's dictates. The Taj is only a typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier. It is hoped that people the world over who study Indian history will awaken to this new finding and revise their erstwhile beliefs. Those interested in an indepth study of the above and many other revolutionary rebuttals may read Shri P.N. Oak's other research books.